You should really limit the number of games that one author can post in one day.
RSS feed | Page:
Posted: 2007-08-14 16:37:26 # You should really limit the number of games that one author can post in one day.
Posted: 2007-09-18 23:22:37 # This idea would certainly help to keep games from going into oblivion before the world passes through a 24 hour cycle. I was under the impression that this was being followed, but recently that hasn't been the case. New games, if they are lucky, last 1 day, 5 hours! I personally have unpublished games and I wait until my entry disappears before I publish a new one, so everyone can create.
Posted: 2007-09-19 09:09:38 # Ronald:
I don't go to quite your extreme, but I also try to limit what I post. In my case, 2 per day at most.
Posted: 2007-09-19 09:11:37 # (Oops: sent before I finished)
Anyway, sometimes my games last for a couple of days, maybe even 3 in low-traffic times. Other times, they are gone in less than 24 hours.
It's hard to predict what times will be high- or low-traffic, but as time goes by, the low-traffic times become less common.
Posted: 2007-09-20 17:06:14 # At wikipedia they have a link called "Randon Article", maybe something like that ("Random Game") might help to "discover" games that haven't been played in a loooong time... I don't know, just a thought.
Posted: 2007-09-21 09:36:10 # Actually, there is something kind of like that now. When you get to the info page of any game, there is a "related games" area that shows you 3 games from the same area (science, geography, history, etc.)
In the upcoming upgrade that section will remain, and will be augmented by a section on games by the same author.
Not fully random, but if you're playing a game in entertainment, you'll get more of the same subject to pick from.